One of the planet's biggest competitions just started, but most Americans have no idea.
It will be the world's most-watched sporting event of 2012 – aside from
that little summer shindig in London – yet the chances are you have
never heard of it.
The T20 Cricket World Cup began this week and over the course of the
next 16 days will be watched by an estimated 1.5 billion people, or
around a quarter of the global population.
India takes on Afghanistan in a T20 Cricket World Cup match.The tournament will captivate the top 12 nations in cricket, of which the United States
is not one, perhaps the primary reason why the sport and its showpiece
competitions float by without registering so much as a blip on the
American radar.
It was not always thus; trace back a couple of centuries and the U.S.
was a powerhouse of cricket, even taking part in (and losing) the first
ever international match against Canada in 1844.
Nowadays, cricket in the U.S. is mainly played by expats, although there
is a smart new stadium in Lauderhill, Fla., where 16,000 watched an
international game between New Zealand and the West Indies – representing several small Caribbean islands – a few months back.
Given the diverse cultural topography of this country, the market for cricket (immigrants hailing from India, Pakistan, Australia
and the United Kingdom) is still solid, strong enough for ESPN to
broadcast every match of the T20 World Cup on its digital platform.
And while cricket may come laced with tales of bamboozling rules and
customs, there is actually plenty to like about T20 – the most
action-packed and exciting version of a game thought to have begun more
than 300 years ago.
As times have moved on, so has cricket been forced to evolve. Even if
you have never seen a bowler hurl down a googly or a leg-spinner, you
have probably heard of one of cricket's most bizarre quirks: the fact
that it takes an extraordinary amount of time to play.
Test cricket, the most prestigious version of the game, involves matches
lasting up to five days, with often seven hours of play per day. And at
the end of it all, there is no guarantee there will be a winner, if the
weather or the nature of the match slows proceedings. Yep, that's 35
hours of playing time with the possibility of no result. That's more
than a boxer might spend in the ring in his entire career or twice as
much as most NFL players will spend on the field in a season.
Such elongated affairs were all very well when the game was played by
the genteel classes in Victorian England, but they aren't so conducive
to the modern world. Hence, in the late 1960s, a reduced version of
cricket that spanned a single day was invented. This also sparked such
innovations as colored clothing instead of the traditional all-white
uniforms, an easily visible ball (white instead of red) and music
instead of polite applause paired with tea and scones.
The 21st century, though, is the era of the ever-dwindling attention
span, and it became clear even a full day was too long for the younger
generation. As attendances dropped, cricket's organizers responded and a
special task force borrowed heavily from Major League Baseball to come
up with T20 – short for Twenty20 – a version of cricket that can be
completed in around three hours.
The "20" comes from the amount of batting time each team is given. In
all forms of cricket, six balls (or pitches) constitute an over. At the
end of each over a different bowler (or pitcher) takes "the mound,"
which in cricket is a playing strip situated in the middle of the field.
T20 gives each team just 20 overs to score as many runs as possible, as
opposed to an unlimited amount of time in Test cricket or 50 overs in
regular one-day matches. The reduced time frame forces batsmen to take
greater risks and attack freely rather than adopt defensive measures
aimed at trying not to get out.
At first T20 was a domestic competition, beginning in England, then
spreading around the cricket-playing world. Authorities soon realized it
was a huge money spinner and quickly packed the schedule with T20
games. In 2008, the Indian
Premier League formed as a strictly T20 league. Today, the IPL attracts
the best players in the world with two-month contracts worth over $1
million to play for club teams in various Indian cities.
"Whether you like it or not T20 has revolutionized cricket," respected
Indian broadcaster Harsha Bhogle told Yahoo! Sports recently. "It means
big business, big money and big audiences."
A general view of play during a match between West Indies and Australia. (Getty Images)The
current World Cup is a collection of the best national teams in the
world. England is the defending champion, having won two years ago,
while Australia, South Africa, Pakistan and the West Indies are all highly fancied.
Host nation Sri Lanka
has little pedigree in other sports, having won just two Olympic medals
in its history, but is utterly obsessed with cricket, and bumper crowds
are expected to cheer on its world-class team.
The shortened nature of T20 means it can sometimes be a bit of a lottery
and it is not to the liking of some of the traditionalists who prefer
batters to score with deft placement rather than hefty swipes of brute
force.
"T20 has evolved a lot, though," said legendary Australian bowler Shane
Warne. "The game has changed over the past few years and there is a lot
more intricacy to it now. Before it was just about trying to smash it
over the fence, but now there are a lot of different tactics and you can
never stop thinking."
Cricket in the U.S. continues to be largely a non-entity, although the
national team has shown some signs of promise in recent times, having
gained promotion to division three of the World Cricket League – two
steps below the top international standard.
So while large sections of the world, especially the Indian
sub-continent, will revel in all the World Cup action over the next two
weeks, the American market will be largely oblivious as one of the
biggest sporting events of the year drifts by making barely a murmur.
News Source:Yahoo